Thursday, December 6, 2007

Christianity in the Fast Lane

If you have time, take a look at some thinking on paper (or pixels) about our 21st century rat race.

Someone once told me, "You can take the rat out of the race, but you can't take the rat out of the rat."

Christianity in the Fast Lane

Thursday, October 4, 2007

IS THE BIBLE GOD'S WORD?

Is The Bible God's Word? is an old essay of mine, and I would like to republish it serially. Hopefully, I can share it in parts as listed below. Click on the parts to read the entire text of each part.

Starting Points

Inspiration

Debates & Unbelievers

Why Can't They Believe?

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Picked up a copy of the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” the other day. Just in case you’re wondering, it’s a proclamation of the UN General Assembly from December 10, 1948. The declaration considers all people everywhere members of the “human family.” It speaks of the “conscience of mankind” and a lot of other one-world nonsense.

Did you know the UN considers “freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want as the highest aspiration of the common people”? What do they mean by “common people”? Do they mean all the people everywhere in common, or do they mean the people who have to work for a living? The latter would seem to agree with the so-called “freedom from fear and want.” So if the UN rules the world, they will supply not just all my needs but even my wants. This is beginning to look a lot like something competing for the title of God.

The so-called Article 1 says all human beings are “endowed with reason and conscience.” Really? Who “endowed” us with these? God or the UN? The article goes on to say we “should” all act in a “spirit of brotherhood.” And who is our father? God or the UN?

Article 3 reads, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.” Everyone? Even unborn babies? And “security of person” sure sounds a lot like the right to bear arms. So the UN says we have the right to security of person, and if I choose to use firearms to secure my person and be free from fear, then certainly the UN would protect those rights, right? Yeah, right.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

God's Law and the New Covenant

Have questions about the place of the Law in the New Covenant? I do. Just for fun click on the LAW link to see some of my brainstorming. Trust me, I'm still searching the Scriptures on this topic.

I will try to add questions in the near future as I have time and new ideas.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Total Inability

Nottmb wrote an essay 20 years ago and tried to explain Total Depravity. He compared Jimmy Swaggart and Roman Catholicism to show the opposite doctrine of free will. If you have time, click on the link Total Inability and see how Swaggart and Rome make strange bedfellows.

Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Land of the Free

Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees, and that write grievousness which they have prescribed; To turn aside the needy from judgment, and to take away the right from the poor of my people, that widows may be their prey, and that they may rob the fatherless! (Isa 10:1-2)

Have you flown the friendly skies lately? This summer (2007) I had the pleasure to participate in a short-term mission to Hungary. My two older sons went with me. The mission trip was wonderful. The airport experience was frightening.

I could also mention the extreme difficulty I had acquiring a U.S. Passport, but that would take an entire new blog; so suffice it to say I received my Passport within three hours of the scheduled flight departure from New Orleans.

Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., in a recent April 2007 talk, said “Traveling on airplanes reminds us how much freedom we’ve lost and how we have become accustomed to it.” If you haven’t flown recently, let me help explain a little of what Rockwell is saying.

Our U.S. Constitution protects us from “unreasonable searches and seizures.” Obviously, “unreasonable” is up for grabs. Anybody want to define “unreasonable”? The socialists in D.C. are content with defining anything done at an airport as “reasonable.” After all, they are trying to prevent hijackings, bombings, and other acts of terrorism. So we all just bend over (sometimes literally) and allow government bureaucrats to have their way with us and our belongings.

Don’t think about trying to interrupt the routine. While we were waiting in airports, we were regularly advised over loudspeakers to “report suspicious activity.” You better walk right, talk right, and if you are waiting, you better wait right too, or else someone might interrogate you about your nervous pacing in the boarding area.

Go ahead and empty your pockets, take off your belt, your hat, and your shoes. And don’t forget to put all your toiletries in a clear, one-quart, zip-lock bag. Your liquids and gels are limited to three ounces each. Any violations here and the items will be seized, regardless of how “unreasonable” it might be. Forget about probable cause, don’t worry about oaths or affirmations, and especially don’t bring up the notion of a Warrant.

Maybe we have forgotten our true shield and defender, our God. Maybe we now rely solely on government to protect and defend us. Government will protect our "right" to "feel" safe at the expense of our right to that certain unalienable Right of Liberty. Our own government was founded to secure Liberty--honest--you can read about it in the Declaration of Independence. And our founders knew from whence these rights came, "You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe" (John Adams, second President of the US).

Thursday, August 30, 2007

What is a "church"?

And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it (Matt 16:18)

What is a church? Regardless of your theological perspective, whatever your answer is, it is wrong. A church is a 501(c)3 corporation registered with the state. It’s an organization that is tax exempt and can provide receipts for contributions when no goods or services are provided in return. We have allowed the state to define a church for us.

Can you imagine John Bunyan’s opinion of the “church” in America? John Bunyan was imprisoned for preaching without a license. Can you imagine that…”OK, Mister Bunyan, we understand you want to preach. All you need to do is simply receive a license from the state and you will then be free to preach.” Or maybe…”We really want you to be able to preach, Mr. Bunyan; however, you must first obtain a license from the state.”

Ever wonder what Bunyan might have done in the 21st Century? “OK, Mr. Bunyan, you cannot provide that food and shelter for that family and later provide them with any receipts for contributions. You will lose your tax exempt status.” Mr. Bunyan might want to allow some input from the Federal Government and take some funds to assist with “faith-based ministries.” Of course Mr. Bunyan might have to hire some unwanted church administrators and assistants simply to meet some arbitrary standard of diversity if he chooses to receive government funds.

The IRS can now locate all the 501(c)3 “churches” and if necessary monitor ministry activity. And let’s not forget that politics and religion don’t mix when it comes to saying things from the pulpit; that is, Mr. Bunyan cannot preach to persuade his entire church to endorse any political candidate. There’s even debate over whether or not a pastor can speak on major political issues at all. And of course with the threat of “hate crime” legislation on the horizon, pastors will be under even tighter scrutiny in the near future.

So, what is the definition of a church again?

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Blind Leaders of the Blind

Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God (Jn 3:3).

"He cannot see" sounds like blindness. Even if it's not a type of blindness, it still seems to imply that a man can search and search and look and look and hunt and hunt til the cows come home, and he still cannot, will not, be able to find what he's looking for when it comes to the Kingdom of God. If he's not blind, he might as well be because unless he's born again, "he cannot see the kingdom of God." This is the essence of spiritual blindness; that is, the things that matter for eternity are simply not visible to the naked eye of an unregenerate (un-born-again) man.

Who made it this way? The God of Isaiah...the God of Isaiah 45:7...the God who controls all things, even whether or not a man can see or not see the Kingdom of God. (See my Isaiah 45:7 blog)

The one who's "born again" can see the Kingdom of God and a whole lot more. Much like the "children of Issachar, which were men that had understanding of the times..." born again believers can often discern the bigger picture, the larger vision, the effect on the times. Could it be possible, that just maybe, this is the reason why so many fail to see the real nature of the so-called "War on Terror"?

Terror, per se, is a tactic. Slash and burn is a tactic. Blitzkrieg is a tactic, it was a highly mobile form of mechanized warfare used by the Germans in WWII. Terror has been used by leaders to maintain control. It's now being used to harass and weaken the victims of terror.

The question is "Who is using TERROR tactics?" Answer: "terrorists" No way! Wrong answer or at least an incomplete answer. Terrorists are people. What kind of people? Who are they? If we had some "children of Issachar" living among us today, would they not answer: Muslims.

Maybe the leaders of the U.S.A., Great Britain, France, Germany, Holland, and several others just simply are blind to the fact that Muslims are conducting assaults in a joint effort worldwide to over throw the West. Could it be that they refuse to see the assault on the Kingdom of God by the Muslim infidels? And most likely it is their own personal blindness to the truth of the Gospel because they are not born again and therefore cannot see these things in the true spiritual perspective. They do not understand, they do not know, they do not believe that they have been given a charge from God to wield His sword for righteousness' sake (Romans 13). They are to serve and protect the people and the land according to God's Word.

Right about now you fear I am advocating a "Theocracy." You fear I want the Church to rule the State. No, that's not what I want. I want the State to do it's God ordained job and rule according to righteousness. The Church is not responsible to run the State; God did not ordain that to be so. God ordained a State with magistrates who are to run the civil government of the nation. Our own government has a law that was drawn up by men who "understood the times." Our U.S. Constitution is a model of what responsible Government leaders can and should do when governing according to principles they have learned by studying God's Word.

Until our socialist leaders in Washington D.C. bow the knee to the King of kings, we will continue to be plagued with more and more threats of Islamo-facist terror attacks. Until our socialist leaders understand that there is a bigger spiritual picture they cannot see without first being born again, we will continue to slide toward Sodom and Gomorrha.

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

ISAIAH 45:7

"I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things."


Do you believe that God is in control of everything? Yes, everything, like even the pixels on your screen forming this post. Is God truly in sovereign control of all events we experience or witness or read and hear about in the news?

Could it be that God is still moving and shaping nations just as He did in the days of Isaiah and Jeremiah? Is there a real purpose for the War on Terror? Is God to be glorified or ignored in what we call "world affairs"?

Does God's sovereignty make us robots? Or could it be that maybe we just don't understand just how enslaved we are to sin. Could it be that we think we are free, but in reality we are in bondage to our wills that are corrupted by sin? Is there really such a thing as a human nature that is totally depraved?

It would seem that the total inability of man is at the root of all the problems of the world. Sin is universal. All men everywhere have been affected since Adam. All men refuse to believe that God is truly in control of everything. All men refuse to bow in total submission to the one true King of Kings, the Creator of the universe, the only God and Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ.